Science and technology secretary Peter Kyle asked Google boss to “sense check” AI policy and told Amazon he’d “advocate” for them to competition watchdog
Genuinely shocking to see how cheap it is for billionaires to buy influence:
'Campaigners told us they were “alarmed” at the influence of these ‘Big Five’ tech giants, which each gave $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund.'
Tech companies have got experience and they have got something to say. But where is the counterbalancing voice of citizens and companies which are directly impacted by AI?
In "The Price of Civilization", Jeffrey Sachs makes the point that in the Obama medicare debates, there was input from insurers, pharmaceuticals and healthcare organisations. Nothing from the patients that would be affected!
The only reason they want to sell AI to us is because they (big tech) want to establish global control so that our countries are run by them to profit THEM! Our privacy and security is at risk! Wake up Starmer, they are not your friends. AI is the future I grant you that but I'd rather finance a British company than rely on other, mostly American companies to get it. We have the smart people in this country who are not just out to enrich themselves and to hell with everything if it goes tits up. They paid millions to get trump elected for one reason. HE WILL SELL OUT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER!
This is part of what my first-draft constitution says:
(a) Elected representatives may not promote the interests of any person or organisation for reward, and must disclose any memberships, employment, contracts, or interests that may affect their judgement.
(b) Ministers and advisers serving in any government must disclose all contact with lobbyists immediately. They shall give fair and equal access to any community group or organisation as to lobbyists.
Genuinely shocking to see how cheap it is for billionaires to buy influence:
'Campaigners told us they were “alarmed” at the influence of these ‘Big Five’ tech giants, which each gave $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund.'
Tech companies have got experience and they have got something to say. But where is the counterbalancing voice of citizens and companies which are directly impacted by AI?
In "The Price of Civilization", Jeffrey Sachs makes the point that in the Obama medicare debates, there was input from insurers, pharmaceuticals and healthcare organisations. Nothing from the patients that would be affected!
Surely we need that here...
The only reason they want to sell AI to us is because they (big tech) want to establish global control so that our countries are run by them to profit THEM! Our privacy and security is at risk! Wake up Starmer, they are not your friends. AI is the future I grant you that but I'd rather finance a British company than rely on other, mostly American companies to get it. We have the smart people in this country who are not just out to enrich themselves and to hell with everything if it goes tits up. They paid millions to get trump elected for one reason. HE WILL SELL OUT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER!
This is part of what my first-draft constitution says:
(a) Elected representatives may not promote the interests of any person or organisation for reward, and must disclose any memberships, employment, contracts, or interests that may affect their judgement.
(b) Ministers and advisers serving in any government must disclose all contact with lobbyists immediately. They shall give fair and equal access to any community group or organisation as to lobbyists.